资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
戏曲艺术焕发新的魅力和风采(2)****** 戏曲艺术来自民间、成长于民间,生动展现了中国人的思维方式、价值观念、审美理想,以人民性为厚重底色,涵养着中国人共同的精神家园。戏曲在艺术形式、思想内容、表达手法上都具有鲜明特色。作为在中国社会流传千载、广泛普及的文化载体,戏曲在赓续文脉、弘扬传统文化上的作用尤为突出,具有显著的传承性特征。 正是缘于中华文化源源不断的滋养,戏曲艺术才能卓然屹立于世界民族艺术之林,璀璨夺目。而今,推进文化自信自强需要戏曲艺术进一步扎根中国大地,萃取传统文化精华,把艺术创造力和中华文化价值融合起来,把中华美学精神和当代审美追求结合起来,夯实戏曲创新创造的文化根脉。 近来,国家深化高等教育学科专业体系改革,艺术学门类专业目录调整中的一大亮点是把戏曲与曲艺等传统艺术门类与一级学科并列,这在戏曲艺术发展史和戏曲教育发展史上具有重要意义。我们应抓住契机,加快中国戏曲学派建设发展,拓展、丰富和完善戏曲艺术知识体系,用我们自己的语言将戏曲内涵总结好梳理好,将其中蕴含的中华文明精神标识和文化精髓提炼好展示好。强调戏曲艺术的文化根脉和民族特性,不是故步自封、盲目排外,而是坚持不忘本来、吸收外来、面向未来,让戏曲在世界文学艺术领域更好彰显中国气派、中国风范。 立足艺术特质,推进守正创新 戏曲艺术包容万端、自成体系、雅俗共赏,是我国传统艺术的典范。研究和发展戏曲艺术,要立足艺术本体,探寻戏曲之所以成为戏曲的内在规定性,进而以守正创新推动创造性转化、创新性发展,使戏曲艺术焕发新的魅力和风采。 戏曲艺术合歌舞、说唱、滑稽戏于一处,熔诗歌、音乐、舞蹈、美术等于一炉,集唱、念、做、打于一身,汇时间艺术、空间艺术于一体,建立起以舞台表演为核心的复合演剧体系,在世界三大戏剧体系中综合程度最高。戏曲艺术反映生活的基本手法,最主要、最突出的在于虚拟性,对舞台时空的处理简洁灵动,极力追求神似而不一味追求形似,极大增强了艺术内涵和感染力,形成了具有中国人审美特性的舞台艺术风格。高度的程式性是戏曲艺术又一个显著特质,它是反映生活的具体化表现形式,将生活动作加以合理的抽象概括,赋予舞台表演规范化的格式,并由此延展至其他各个方面,经过长期艺术实践发展为约定俗成的基本规制。 (文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() |